Normal view MARC view ISBD view

A principled approach to abuse of dominance in European competition law /

by Gormsen, Liza Lovdahl.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookSeries: The Cambridge antitrust and competition law series.Publisher: New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010Description: 207p. cm.ISBN: 9780521767149 (hardback).Subject(s): Antitrust law -- European Economic Community countriesOnline resources: Cover image
Contents:
Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; 2. Consumer welfare theory, different schools of thought and efficiencies; 3. Objectives; 4. The legitimacy of the consumer welfare goal in Article 82; 5. The role of effects in Article 82; 6. Guidelines; 7. The way forward.
Summary: "Three questions surround the interpretation and application of Article 82 of the EC Treaty. What is its underlying purpose? Is it necessary to demonstrate actual or likely anticompetitive effects on the market place when applying Article 82? And how can dominant undertakings defend themselves against a finding of abuse? Instead of the usual discussion of objectives, Liza Lovdahl Gormsen questions whether the Commission's chosen objective of consumer welfare is legitimate. While many Community lawyers would readily accept and indeed welcome the objective of consumer welfare, this is not supported by case law. The Community Courts do not always favour consumer welfare at the expense of economic freedom. This is important for dominant undertakings' ability to advance efficiencies and for understanding why the Chicago and post-Chicago School arguments cannot be injected into Article 82"--Provided by publisher.
List(s) this item appears in: Competition Law | Atheism
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due
Reference Reference Knowledge Centre
->8th Floor; Rack-14
Military, Tax, Trade Law 343.240721 GOR (Browse shelf) Not for loan

Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; 2. Consumer welfare theory, different schools of thought and efficiencies; 3. Objectives; 4. The legitimacy of the consumer welfare goal in Article 82; 5. The role of effects in Article 82; 6. Guidelines; 7. The way forward.

"Three questions surround the interpretation and application of Article 82 of the EC Treaty. What is its underlying purpose? Is it necessary to demonstrate actual or likely anticompetitive effects on the market place when applying Article 82? And how can dominant undertakings defend themselves against a finding of abuse? Instead of the usual discussion of objectives, Liza Lovdahl Gormsen questions whether the Commission's chosen objective of consumer welfare is legitimate. While many Community lawyers would readily accept and indeed welcome the objective of consumer welfare, this is not supported by case law. The Community Courts do not always favour consumer welfare at the expense of economic freedom. This is important for dominant undertakings' ability to advance efficiencies and for understanding why the Chicago and post-Chicago School arguments cannot be injected into Article 82"--Provided by publisher.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
Free Counter